Home arrow Human Rights Fraud & Abuse arrow E-Mail: Scientologist fair games an SP
E-Mail: Scientologist fair games an SP PDF Print E-mail
Suppressive Person Doctrine
Article Index
E-Mail: Scientologist fair games an SP
Page 2
Page 3
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Caroline Letkeman [mailto: This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it ]
    Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 5:15 PM
    To: tony lavoie
    Subject: RE: dead wrong


-----Original Message-----
From: tony lavoie [mailto: This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it ]
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 11:40 PM
To: This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Subject: dead wrong

Caroline,
Never have I written to someone so bent on distorting and destroying a Church.

    Dear Mr. LaVoie:

    I take your message as threatening, and you are clearly a very disturbed person, who either has and believes hallucinations, or you are inventing hallucinations for Scientology's nasty purposes. How on earth does anyone distort a church?

    I am simply telling the truth about the Scientology cult. If Scientology is really so false and dishonest that it is destroyed by truth, it is the fault of its inventor and its members like yourself who keep the falseness and dishonesty working.


But lets face it, your not doing anyone any favors, it is factually for your own good SP declares happen.

    I notice that throughout your message you spell the contraction "you're" as "your." Do you do that to be insulting, as a putdown because I'm an SP and don't deserve proper grammar and respect? Or is that really indicative of your education level from having done Scientology so long?

    You are totally wrong about SP declares being for the SPs' own good. That was the kind of reasoning the nazis used when they rounded up the Jews "for their own good." The "Suppressive Person" doctrine is a hateful concept with no valid basis, but based only in the sociopathy of its author L. Ron Hubbard, its enforcer David Miscavige, and their co-conspirators or dupes like yourself.

    You were in the Sea Org. Are you still?


For even an SP won't survive the future without Scientology Tech.

    No, that's a stupid lie, disproven by the very fact that I'm here now still surviving in what is the future after you wrote that stupidity. And it's a lie that justifies the victimization of good people. Obviously you support victimizing people, and you use the SP doctrine to justify that victimization.

In fact, your real motive is your daughter

    What do you mean by this? Clearly you are either somewhat illiterate, or you are pretending to be illiterate, in order to be threatening and carry out your attack. You have either written or you imply here that I don't want my own daughter to survive. That is sick, but typical, Scientology black propaganda.

and perhaps your driven by your very own bitter state of affairs.

    Again you demonstrate with your terrible grammar that you either mean to insult me, and threaten me with your appearance of unintelligence, or you are actually unintelligent, perhaps as a result of your Scientology experience. Perhaps you can explain what it is.

    It is true that I was victimized by Scientology, defrauded out of more than $60,000 and 24 years of my life on false promises, and fair gamed when I spoke up about your cult's lies, abuses and noxious policies and practices.

    And it is true that your cult's leaders made my daughter disconnect from me. But it is Scientology's state of affairs, and its malevolent doctrines, policies and practices, like the SP doctrine, Fair Game, Black PR and Disconnection, that drive me to tell the truth about these doctrines, policies and practices.

    Believe me, when Scientologists such as yourself wake up to how dishonest and criminal your cult is, and act to end these terrible doctrines, policies and practices in your organization, I will be very happy to pursue other interests.


There are planets, more then one, even I can recall that are far, far worse then this one, in your next life you should be so happy and lucky to return to this one.

    Your illiteracy, whether pretended for attack purposes, or real and not pretended at all, certainly makes understanding difficult. It is clear, nevertheless, that you are lying about recalling planets far, far worse than this one. Name them.

    Don't you think that your obvious fear of returning to some other far, far worse planet, which gives you reason to stay in a dishonest, sociopathic cult to your detriment, is frightfully paranoid?


But, you won't.

    I won't what? Be lucky and return to this planet?

I hope it isn't hell for you.

    That's a load. You obviously are postulating me onto your hallucinatory far, far worse planet if I don't stop stating the truth about Hubbard, Miscavige and Scientology.

You are being very ignorant.

    Well here's your opportunity to point out some facts I missed or got wrong. And your fear of a far, far worse planet in my future or your future is not a demonstration of my ignorance and your superior intelligence.

You have this life to set yourself straight. It's still not too late.

    I take it you mean this as a threat.

If you don't see life as a game that's fine, but your loosing everything, and every hope.

    Again, your grammar and your spelling show an abysmal lack of education and understanding. But believe me, everything is impossible to lose, and the source of hope is certainly neither Hubbard nor Scientology.

And your dead wrong in your "solutions".

    Are you just too lazy to type "you're" or "you are," or has Scientology kept you so suppressed that you've lost touch with the intellectual level at which wogs actually communicate? Or, is it simply that you really do hate SPs so much that you can't grant us even enough credence to communicate with proper grammar and spelling?

    What "solutions" are you talking about?


Already, anyone can see what your doing wouldn't be much different toward Christ, had he pissed you off.

    You're doing. Christ, of course, doesn't have a "Suppressive Person" doctrine. He isn't a pathological liar like Hubbard. He doesn't hate, vilify and Fair Game good people who tell the truth.


(And He did upset many, those like you, who can not follow anything.)

    That's a suppressive generality. Do you have some reference for this insult? Surely you're not projecting onto me your own inability, whether pretended or not, to follow grammar and spelling rules. Or do you mean my refusal to follow Hubbard the sociopath, Miscavige the bully, or Scientology the criminal scam, which you follow so religiously?


Good luck, and so long.

Try to come to your senses, because this Planet is a dream compared to where you might end up.


    I take this as a threat. Perhaps you'll reread what you've written and be shocked enough by your hallucinations and threats and the level of miseducation Scientology has left you at, that you walk away.

Sorry, that IS the way it is.

   
Illusions will never be real no matter how real they are for you.

Some night look up to the stars, a bright clear night when you can see the billions of them, and tell yourself I'm wrong...totally wrong. You know I'm not.


    I know you're either utterly deluded, or you're executing some sick Scientology operation or program. Either way, your hope lies not in Scientology where truth is suppressed and people who tell the truth are attacked as Suppressive Persons, but as a wog somewhere in the wog world where truth and telling it can be welcomed.

It's not true Scientologist don't care. I care about you. There is just no sense wasting mine and your time if you insist on being as stupid as you are.

    I really don't think that by your demonstration so far of your intelligence, knowledge and wisdom you are really qualified to pronounce me stupid. With all my human faults, I was at least given enough wisdom to break away from Scientology, and enough intelligence to penetrate and invalidate its terrible SP doctrine. I believe that you have within you what it would take for you to do the same.

Sincerely,

tony


    So if you're not going to be wasting my time and yours, where does the caring come in?

    Caroline

Mr. LaVoie responded in ALL CAPS ...


 
< Previous Article   Next Article>