Home
Training Indoctrination
Lecture: Standard Tech Defined-2
Training Indoctrination
Lecture: Standard Tech Defined-2 | Lecture: Standard Tech Defined-2 |
|
|
|
| Training Indoctrination | |
|
Hubbard talks to Class VIII students about Scientology's "standard tech." Remarks about the correct attitude toward applying his technology, that is, without question or variation in Hubbard's exact instructions. Says if people have questions, it is because it is "just confusion blowing off."
Remarks that they "cracked" the case of someone who had been giving them trouble. Scientology's idea of successful processing is referred to as "case-cracking." Makes strong accusations against Freud and Breuer; says they were agents of Kaiser Wilhelm Hogensoloven, dedicated to making politically-minded changes for him. Brags about his abilities as a swami. Says there are usable magical principles in Scientology. Demands exact application of his correctly evaluated technology and discourages questions about it. Hubbard uses confusion technique on his students in this lecture. Now, somewhere up the line you get to start auditing this. And when you start auditing this you're gonna get so damned dizzy and power-happy somebody'll probably have to shoot you down with a shot gun, because a guy just goes completely wild. Normally speaking he goes wild on this. He, he does exactly right, he does exactly what he's supposed to do, the PC all of a sudden goes zzzooooooommmm, just like he's supposed to do, and he all of a sudden realizes he can do it. And you can't speak to him for days.1 And then the mistake he makes is he now thinks he can case supervise also.2 This is another field. It's based on the same principles, but you have to know. If you have to know it well to audit it you have to know it ten times as well to case supervise it. Now, I, I know, I caught that, that there'd been one or two people in this class who were case supervisors at Saint Hill, and so forth, and you can put it down to my charity that you haven't been ground up for hamburger. Because what I see here, wow. I taught you better than this. There was a thing called standard tech. There has been a thing called standard tech since 1966, but nobody's caught the brass ring. So I'm putting that brass ring firmly in your paw. I'm not trying to make you guilty, I'm merely trying to give you one hundred percent win. One hundred percent. If you get less than hundred percent, you goofed! If you get less than one hundred percent as a case supervisor, you goofed! Less than a hundred percent as an auditor, you goofed. Some of the goofs are beyond your control. And sometimes you hit a real goof that you can't do anything about at all. And those are the goofs which you shouldn't goof on.3 [...] Now if there's a big question in your mind as to whether or not Scientology works you shouldn't be studying Class VIII. Because, one is expected to be a sufficiently expert auditor to produce some result, such as a touch assist. He should be able to do that, and achieve some result. But if one has got big questions about this and that, please recognize them for what they are. They're just confusion blowing off.4 [...] I don't do these folders from crystal balls, boy. I do these just, these folders against the most concise series of data you ever heard of. Srrrrrp-boom! We cracked a case today down the middle. Down the middle, cross-wise and diagonally. It was just about, he'd given us a bad time. We keep cracking 'em. Knowing the data. Knowing the exact, basic rules and laws.5 Now there's something funny about all this. I know a lot of other subjects in which such data occurs. I can give you the datum of Freudian analysis. I'm a very good swami. I can read minds so as to tear your skull off. Good at it. Don't ever do these things. Still know the data in connection with it. Why? Then out of this tremendous body of information are we stressing just these data? I've got us the widest possible selection. It's the evaluation of importance, knowing which point is valuable and what is trash. It is knowing where the main line lies and where it doesn't.6 I wouldn't give you spit for any datum in Freudian analysis. I wouldn't give you dog spit for it. In fact Freud and Breuer probably should have been stood up against the nearest brick wall and shot unpleasantly, with dull bullets. You've always heard me be polite on that subject. I'm taking down my hair. I'm talking to a Class VIII student. What a lot of crap. You know who they really were? They were some guys who had found out how you could take the work of Charcot and Mesmer and persuade people to do things against their will under pain-drug hypnotism. And there isn't an analyst on the planet who ever does anything else in the... It's a method of shaking people down and bending their will. Breuer and Freud, in 1891, were agents of Kaiser Wilhelm Hogensoloven. And they were dedicated to making politically-minded changes for him. A bunch of crap. A complete swindle. Just a hypnotist. So he invents the libido-dibido theory, and he goes poogly-poods and ids, and Greek mythology, and bah!7 There're certain principles involved in any savage and primitive think that you can use. Certain principles involved. There's certain magical principles. There's opening up somebody's memory, making him, forcing him or persuading him to remember something painful, and so forth. These are known to every medicine man, every swami there is. How is it they knew it and never used it, huh? Right now, right now the beautiful technology, heh, of these characters is turned against Scientology, because the politicians you hear crying out against them have wives who have been violated by psychoanalysis. They are under the influence.8 There are thousands of zones where data could lie. There're billions of zones where, that you could consider truth. There's a whole universe out here full of crap and bucks. And I show you one little, narrow line that goes straight through it, like a shock, and a few gates, which if you open them exactly correctly, somebody goes out like he is on a rocket ride.9 So if you ever mention to me again a question about something over in left field I'll have you spanked. This is a lousiest thing - what the hell is anybody doing wandering around over here in left field? Here's the main road. Let's get on it, let's find out what the principles on it are. I didn't mean to curse you that mildly. Here's the main highway. Now knock off the mucking about and get on it. There aren't any questions about it, it just is. And it's a certain series of actions that you do.10 — L. Ron Hubbard Lecture 27 September 1968: Standard Tech Defined 1 Hubbard is discussing the supposed power thrill that auditors get when they realize they can cause effects on their preclears. 2 Case supervisors oversee the auditing done by auditors. They are experts in programming cases. Their job includes correcting auditors and other technical personnel when they make mistakes in tech delivery. 3 Hubbard projects responsibility for technical goofs onto tech personnel even when they can't do anything about them. There must be no question that the tech and Hubbard is always right. 4 Hubbard could not tolerate anyone questioning his technology. Here he gives his blanket diagnosis for someone asking questions: "confusion blowing off." "Confusion and the stable datum" is a fundamental concept in Scientology, introduced in a basic Hubbard book, Problems of Work. Hubbard taught that when you are attempting to put in order, confusion blows off. Much of Scientology processing addresses the mind on the basis of confusions and the incorrect stable data within the confusions. Auditing eradicates or otherwise neutralizes false "stable data" from preclears' "reactive minds." Hubbard designed several auditing rundowns for students, including Method One Word-clearing, the Student Booster Rundown, the Student Rehabilitation List, the Student Confessional List, and the False Purpose Rundown Student Form. He also designed many corrective measures for training personnel to edit out "wrong" stable data from students' past education that don't align with Hubbard's tech. All barriers to 100% duplication and acceptance of Hubbard's material are eradicated, either in session with an auditor, in the courseroom with a word-clearer or supervisor, in Qual with a cramming officer, or in Ethics with a Master of Arms. Hubbard of course did not reveal that he repeatedly caused confusion in order to implant his own stable data in Scientologists. By many credible accounts, and by Hubbard's own admissions, he was a skilled stage magician before Scientology and admitted to many unethical hypnosis tricks. 5 Flag promotes their organization in Clearwater as the Mecca for Technical Perfection. Scientologists learn from Scientology promotional material and from their Flag contacts that if they are unhappy with their case progress locally, they should go to Flag to get their cases cracked by the world's best auditors. Cracking a case is understood in Scientology as solving a case. Case-cracking auditing is a wide range of auditing processes which dissociate (or split) and reindoctrinate. Advanced Scientologists identify the confused psychological content being cracked apart as clusters of disembodied degraded beings who must be addressed with Hubbard's cluster-blowing auditing procedures. Scientology and Dianetic auditing always goes in the direction of separating out, splitting apart, erasing or banishing unwanted psychological content, rather than unifying or integrating one's mental or spiritual components. 6 Hubbard is using the confusion technique on his students and projecting his own activities onto Freud and Breuer. 7 Definition"Psychopolitics ." 8 See Ron the Magus and Ron the Swami . 9 "Going out like he's on a rocket ride" refers to exteriorization, the induction of a dissociative state. 10 All the above to get students into an unquestioning attitude toward his superiorly evaluated system that needs no further evaluation or questioning, only compliance. |
|
| < Previous Article | Next Article> |
|---|


