Home arrow Writings
Writings


Margerie Wakefield: Understanding Scientology PDF Print E-mail
Essays and Articles
PDF format
 
Letter from OSA 6 Apr 1989 PDF Print E-mail
Scientology correspondence
OSA Letter 6 April 1989 p. 1
Letter from OSA 6 April 1989 p.2
 
6 April 89

CAROLINE REINERTSEN
BOX 96
CLEARWATER, FL. 34617

cc: Legal Aide's Comm OSAI
cc: FDF
cc: FEO FSO
cc: FBO FSO
cc: Purser FSO
cc: Captain FSO
cc: FLB Fin Dir

Dear Caroline.

I received your letter nudging me to respond to your petition of 22 Feb 89.

I approved your petition on the portion dealing with the legal aspects of your petition when I first received it. However, I could not approve it in total as I am not a finance authority.

I did research out thoroughly the LRH references on the payment of staff medical bills, and I attached the issues I found to my recommendation to the FBO FSO that your petition be fully approved and implemented. LRH does state in no uncertain terms that a staff members medical bills are covered under his staff agreement and there is no question in my mind that these bills should be paid by the FSO. In a court of law, the FSO will be held fully responsible for your bills as it is part of your legally binding staff agreement.

Since that time, there has been non-compliance on getting your bills on the FSO bills summary and this is being handled. I would like you to write a full KR on this whole sit in PT, as the Purser is right now getting a comm ev and she is the party responsible for your bills being taken off the bills summary. Please get this to me in the next 48 hours and I will see it gets to her comm ev secretary.

While this is getting sorted out, continue to maintain a low profile. I want to get all your bills on the bills summary this week. From that point on, legal will have the authority to say it is an org bill and get in comm with the attorneys/collection agencies and prevent these from becoming lawsuits. Another 4 or 5 of your medical bills have been sent to collection agencies, as

-2-

they have come to me through the legal mail line. These are all addressed to FSO Corp and not yourself.

What I would like to see, which you have not addressed in your petition, is do you have any reentry program to the Sea Org? Once this medical sit is fully handled, are you then able to return to active duty? Since you are a Class 9 auditor, you are a valuable resource and I want to find out about your status. Please let me know on this as the ideal scene, based on what I know of your sit, is to get you fully recovered and back on staff in the FSO.

I look forward to getting your reply to the above. Please give me your phone number so we can keep in comm.

Sincerely,

Judy Johnson
Legal Officer OSA FLAG
 
Despatch 25 March 1989 PDF Print E-mail
Scientology correspondence
Despatch 25 Mar 1989
25 March 1989

cc: Dir Legal Affairs, OSA Flag
cc: OSA INT—Legal Dept.

(2) Captain FSO
(1) Captain's Yeoman FSO
-------------------------
Caroline Reinertsen
P.O. Box 96
Clearwater, FL 34617

Dear Tim:

This follows my letter to you of 14 March, 1999. Did you receive that letter?

Today, I received the attached letter from the BFO FSO. [1] As per my last letter to you, the Purser's position is that the Church is not responsible for the medical bills and has so informed at least one of the creditors on this cycle, in writing.

I still have received no answer to my CSW [2] to the Captain. As you know, I also have a petition to the Dir Legal Affairs, 0SA Flag, due to the legal aspect of this sit. A copy of that petition was included with the CSW received by you and sent to the Captain, FSO.

As time goes on, the likelihood of legal action becomes greater. You see, a creditor, in order to protect his interest, must file a lawsuit within one year of the date of occurrence or service. The hospital in my case has already demonstrated that they intend to pursue whatever avenues necessary to collect their fees, including hiring an attorney as well as a collection agency. Likewise, at least one of the doctors involved intends to pursue legal action if necessary in order to collect on their bill.

As a further R/factor [3] to my physical condition at the time the bills were incurred, I was very sick and could barely sit up without fainting. I could not walk, and I would faint on practically any physical exertion, like rolling over in bed. It was necessary for the MLO [4] to take care of me when I was not in the hospital. I was bedridden from June, 1988 until well after I routed out of the SO in October, 1988. My point here is that I utterly depended upon the MLO to take care of the admin of my medical handling, as it is her hat, and I was given no indication at all that there was going to be difficulty on finance lines. Furthermore, on the second admittance to the hospital, I personally witnessed the MLO make a promise to the hospital's bills dept. that the Church would honor all medical expenses for both of the hospitalizations.

I am in disagreement with the BFO's recommendation that I work this out with the Dir I & R and Purser. This is not a matter which is open for negotiation, with either HCO or the Purser; neither is it an ethics situation, as is being implied.

If there was any financial irregularity, it was committed by the MLO, by promising that the Church would pay. I did not violate any purchasing policy; I made no purchase orders on my own and I will not accept any condition commensurate with such an action.

The LRH policy on the subject of medical expenses for staff is very clear. References are given in my KR of 4 Dec, 1988.

The Church is named as the party responsible for payment right on the hospital records, as authorized by the MLO. As I have no attachable assets and as I am still not working, the Church would be the likely target in any lawsuit, in my opinion.

Furthermore, all the bills were on the Bills Summary until approximately mid-November, which is evidence that the FSO was going to honor the bills. I routed out on October 21, 1988. Apparently, there was an arbitrary entered in that I could be made liable for the bills since I was no longer in the SO. Not Okay. Besides, as you know, even the attorney's involvement predated my departure from the SO. I routed out after an FB turndown due to illness.

Please attach this letter to my CSW to the Captain and ask that the CSW be answered and returned to me ASAP.

Thanks Tim.
Best,
[1] BFO: probably stands for Base Finance Officer.

[2] CSW: "Completed staff work" is an internal despatch that presents the problem or "situation", all the data about it and a recommended solution for the senior to approve or disapprove.

[3] R/factor: "Reality factor." In this context it's a statement about the way things are.

[4] MLO: Medical Liaison Officer.

OCMB Thread:  My ordeal on Flag medical and OSA lines

 
Petition 22 Feb 1989 PDF Print E-mail
Scientology correspondence
Petition for payment of medical bills 22 Feb 1989
22 February, 1989

Dir Legal Affairs, OSA Flag
Caroline Reinertsen
Box 96
Clearwater, FL 34617

cc: OSA Int (Info—Legal Dept.)
cc: Flag Data Files

PETITION

Dear Sir:
I am being threatened with a lawsuit for non-payment of medical bill[s] which were incurred while I was in the SO at FSO.

I am attaching a copy of my 4 Dec 88 KR, which outlines the details of how the medical bills came about. To date, the only response I have received from the terminals listed on this KR has been the Snr Chaplain, FSO, who acknowledged that my position in this matter appears to be per policy. In addition to writing this KR, I have sent several despatches, including CSWs, to various terminals within FSO, in effort to resolve the payment of these bills. After repeated attempts to elicit any response, I wrote to the Dir Comm earlier this month and asked that the matter be handled per HCO PL 17 July, 1966, Vol 0, page 276.

On 21 Feb, 1989, I received a package of letters from the Dir Comm FSO. These were letters addressed to me and sent to the FSO. Some of these letters date back to October, 1938. (I have written a KR on the Dir Comm, as I had properly informed him/her by despatch of 29 Oct, 1988 of my forwarding address.) Among the letters I received on 21 Feb was a letter of representation from Attorney Thomas J. Donnelly, dated 13 October, 1988. I am attaching a copy of his letter. Please note that the envelope to this letter was marked "Legal OK FSO"—but the letter had not been opened prior to my receipt.

Please also note that the attorney was retained and the letter sent out prior to my having routed out of the SO. Receipt of his letter yesterday was the first indication I have had that there is now a legal situation.

I am attaching a copy of a bill I received yesterday via the same package. As you can see, the bill is in the amount of $6,603.30. This figure differs from that given in the attorney's letter, probably because it includes charges from two hospitalizations, whereas the attorney's figure represents charges from only one hospitalization. Apart from this bill, there is an estimated additional $10,000 in bills from various doctors, radiologists, etc., who performed services during my hospitalizations, and which bills may be in some stage of legal/collection proceeding. I received several of these bills yesterday, and can produce them. However, until I left the SO on Oct 27, 1988, all bills received to that date were, per prior arrangement, personally given to the ML0, who relayed them to the Bills Payment Section, FSO.

My hospitalizations were fully authorized. During one of the admissions, I witnessed the ML0 promise the hospital's account department terminal that the Church would honor the bills. The Church of Sen is listed as responsible party on the bill as well as on the hospital's admitting records.

I will maintain a low profile with the attorney, pending your advices. I have not been served with a Summons & Complaint. I believe the Statute will run some time in August, however it is very possible that suit has already been filed.

Quite aside from the fact that I am not in a position financially to bypass and handle the bills myself, the LRH policy on the subject is clear. It is the SO's responsibility to cover medical bills for SO members. (Ref. F0 730 and HCO PL 11 June SIR, Violation of Staff Covenant.)

With this petition I request that:

a) the attorney be contacted by your dept., and that I be kept apprised of developments,

b) the Clearwater Community Hospital's bill be paid immediately,

c) an order be originated that Treasury contact all remaining creditors and place their bills back on the dateline, and

d) an order be originated that FP Committee place the bills back on the Bills Summary and that these be handled as soon as possible.

Thankyou very much for your attention and consideration.

Love,
Caroline Reinertsen
 
Knowledge Report 4 Dec 1988 PDF Print E-mail
Scientology correspondence
4 December, 1988

Dir I & R FSO
________________
Caroline Reinertsen
c/o Box 96
Clearwater, FL 34617

KNOWLEDGE REPORT

cc: Dir Disbursements, FSO
cc: FP Committee, FSO
cc: Senior Chaplain, FSO
cc: Qual Sec, FSO
cc: OSA PR, FLAG
cc: LRH Comm, FSO
cc: Flag Data Files

On October 27, 1988, I routed out of the SO at FSO, after having been fitness boarded due to an extended illness.

While still in the SO, I had been hospitalized on two occasions as a result of this illness. These hospitalizations occurred in June and July, 1988. I had also seen a few doctors prior to being hospitalized. Following the last hospitalization in July, it was necessary for me to see a heart specialist at his clinic (one time) and I also went to Morton Plant emergency room one time. As near as I could estimate, medical bills, including three weeks' hospital, total approximately $16,000.

Each and every hospital and clinic expense was authorized by the MLO, via my C/S. Purchasing liability of staff would not apply.

Following my hospitalization, and while still in the SO, I personally received several calls from medical facilities, inquiring about my outstanding bills. At the advice of the MLO, I referred these calls to Dept 8.

One doctor's office called me twice prior to my leaving the SO. On the first occasion, I asked that this office (Dr. J. Ruiz, 3001 Eastland Bl, Clearwater, FL (813) 797-7566) resubmit their bill to me and that I would ensure that the billing would be received by the proper terminals. Upon receipt of the resubmitted bill, I had the MLO hand deliver it to Dept 8. Nevertheless, the doctor's office called me again several weeks later and told me that they had still not been paid and that Dept 8 was still denying receipt of their bill. To make a long story short, this office has sent five copies of their bill to the FSO and the receipt of this bill is still being denied, according to Marjorie at Dr. Ruiz' office.

Last week I had to make an appointment to see a dentist. As I have a particular heart condition which makes it necessary for me to take antibiotics prior to getting dental treatment, I had to call Dr. Ruiz' office for a prescription. I again spoke with Marjorie and she informed me that their bill has still not been paid. She told me that she has been getting very bad treatment when she calls about the bill. She told me that one of the people she has spoken with is a woman by the name of Williams or Williamson. Marjorie told me that this person was very rude with her and at one point in an agitated tone of voice asked Marjorie how she expected the Church to pay her bill when the Church was still working on bills from March and April. This was gross out PR and it ARC broke Marjorie, especially since she had apparently not been given an R-Factor on how and when her bill would be paid.

After this call with Marjorie, I called Dept 8 myself, and spoke with Paul Johnson. He told me that he has recently come back into the area, and I believe that he told me that he has been on mission. I spoke with Paul briefly about the problem, as above.

To my astonishment, Paul told me that about two weeks ago, the FP Committee elected to take all my medical bills off the Bills Summary, after deciding that since I am no longer in the SO, I should be made responsible for the payment of these bills.

-2-

I borrowed a small amount of money when I routed out to cover my living expenses during my recuperation. Due to my current scene it is completely unreal to expect that I be made responsible for the payment of these bills. But regardless of my physical sit, the action taken by the FP Committee is off-policy. The SO is responsible for medical expenses incurred by SO members.

At one point several weeks before I routed out, it was necessary for me to see a heart specialist. At that time the MLO informed me that the Church would not allocate or otherwise authorize any more money for my medical bills, as I was being FBed. Of course, I did not submit any more bills for payment, but at no time was I ever told or given any impression that the Church was not going to honor the bills already incurred and submitted for payment.

Per FO 732, 16 May 1968, Allowances, by LRH, a Sea Org member is supposed to get medical expenses.

Per HCO PL 11 June 1981R, Violation of Staff Covenant, medical is not charged for.

Caroline Reinertsen
This document in pdf format
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 9 of 51